So you’ve got your heart set on a Royal Enfield, but now you’re stuck between the Royal Enfield Classic 350 and the Hunter 350? Don’t worry — you’re not alone! These two bikes are both from the same stable, yet they offer very different riding vibes. Let’s sit down over a cup of chai and have a real talk about which one makes more sense for you.
In this friendly and practical comparison, we’ll go beyond the spec sheets and look at how these bikes actually feel on the road, how much they cost to maintain, and how they fit into your lifestyle. Whether you ride mostly in the city, love weekend highway rides, or just want to turn heads at every signal — you’ll get a clear idea of which Enfield deserves a spot in your garage.
Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Hunter 350 Design Comparison
The Classic 350 is the old-school charmer. It carries the heritage look of vintage Royal Enfields with its teardrop tank, metal fenders, and round headlamp. It’s perfect for someone who loves that heavy-duty, traditional retro vibe. Park a Classic 350 outside a cafe, and it will get noticed. It’s got that timeless road presence — the kind that makes people glance twice.
On the other hand, the Hunter 350 brings in a younger, more urban twist. It’s compact, more colourful, and feels like it belongs to someone who listens to indie music and zips through narrow streets. The design is minimalistic yet eye-catching, with a shorter stance and sharper edges. If you’re into modern-retro styling and want something that looks nimble and sporty, the Hunter might just win this round.
Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Hunter 350 Performance Comparison
Both bikes share the same 349cc J-series engine, so they’re cousins under the skin. But don’t let that fool you — the riding feel is quite different. The Classic 350 is built for calm cruising. It has a relaxed throttle response and a heavier build, which gives it a planted and composed feel, especially on highways. It’s a bike for those who enjoy a leisurely ride and that signature thump.
The Hunter 350, in contrast, feels way more agile. Thanks to its lighter weight and sharper geometry, it accelerates quicker and handles traffic like a breeze. It’s ideal for daily city rides, U-turns in tight lanes, and even occasional twisty roads. While it doesn’t have the grandeur of the Classic, it offers more fun per gear in busy city conditions.
Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Hunter 350 Mileage Comparison
Mileage matters, especially when fuel prices keep climbing. The Hunter 350 takes a slight edge here. On average, it delivers around 36-40 km/l, especially in city riding where its lighter body helps. If your primary usage is commuting or short weekend rides, this is the more fuel-efficient choice.
The Classic 350, being heavier, gives slightly lower mileage — expect about 32-36 km/l, depending on how and where you ride. On long highway stretches at steady speeds, it does a decent job, but in start-stop traffic, the weight does eat into efficiency a bit. So if you’re looking to save more on fuel in the long run, the Hunter has a small advantage.
Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Hunter 350 Features Comparison
Both bikes are well-equipped, but they focus on different kinds of riders. The Classic 350 comes with a semi-digital instrument cluster, Tripper navigation (on select variants), and options for single or dual-channel ABS. Its switchgear feels premium, and the fit-and-finish is really solid. It’s all about comfort, class, and long-term durability.
The Hunter 350, however, leans more into modern minimalism. It’s got a simpler digital-analog console and also offers Tripper navigation on the higher variant. What stands out is how user-friendly it feels. The seat height is low, it’s super approachable for beginners, and even the mirrors feel better suited for city traffic. So if simplicity and ease of use are your priorities, the Hunter might suit your daily needs better.
Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Hunter 350 Braking and Suspension
Now here’s where things get interesting. The Classic 350 uses a more relaxed suspension setup. It’s plusher, and soaks up potholes and bad roads better — especially when you’re riding solo or with a pillion. The braking is predictable, but the heavier weight means you need to plan your stops a bit in advance.
The Hunter 350 feels sportier in this department. The suspension is stiffer, which means it’s not as cushiony on rough roads, but it gives you better feedback and sharper handling. Braking feels more responsive too, thanks to the lighter frame. For city rides and quick maneuvers, it feels more nimble and confidence-inspiring.
Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Hunter 350 Price Comparison
Let’s talk money. The Hunter 350 is the more budget-friendly option. Prices start from around ₹1.50 lakh (ex-showroom), making it one of the most affordable bikes in the RE lineup. That’s a big plus for first-time Royal Enfield buyers or someone upgrading from a 150cc commuter.
The Classic 350 is priced higher, starting at around ₹1.93 lakh (ex-showroom) and going up based on variant and colour. You’re paying for the legacy, the road presence, and that premium cruiser experience. If budget isn’t too tight and you want something with more “heft” and long-ride comfort, the Classic justifies its price.
Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Hunter 350 – Comparison Table
| Feature | Royal Enfield Classic 350 | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 349cc, Single-cylinder | 349cc, Single-cylinder |
| Power Output | 20.2 bhp | 20.2 bhp |
| Torque | 27 Nm | 27 Nm |
| Mileage (approx) | 32–36 km/l | 36–40 km/l |
| Kerb Weight | 195 kg | 181 kg |
| Seat Height | 805 mm | 800 mm |
| Suspension Setup | Softer, comfort-focused | Stiffer, city-focused |
| Price (Ex-showroom) | ₹1.93 – ₹2.25 lakh | ₹1.50 – ₹1.75 lakh |
| Ideal For | Highway cruisers, retro fans | City riders, young buyers |
Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Hunter 350: Which One is Worth Buying?
Here’s the honest takeaway — both bikes are solid, but they serve very different types of riders. If you’re someone who loves a relaxed, classy ride with a strong road presence, the Classic 350 is your soulmate. It’s the kind of bike that grows on you over time, and it never goes out of style.
But if you’re a city commuter, value agility, and want that Enfield feel without the bulk, the Hunter 350 is the smarter, more youthful choice. It’s easier to ride, easier to own, and offers great value for money. Bottom line? Pick the bike that suits your lifestyle, not just your wishlist. So that’s all in today’s post, for more updates, reviews, and car comparisons, visit IndianGadi.com – your go-to hub for everything on wheels!
FAQs About Royal Enfield Classic 350 vs Hunter 350
Which bike is better for beginners – Classic 350 or Hunter 350?
The Hunter 350 is better suited for beginners due to its lighter weight, lower seat height, and more city-friendly handling.
Is there any difference in engine performance between the two bikes?
Both bikes use the same 349cc engine and produce similar power and torque. But the Hunter feels quicker due to its lighter build.
Which bike gives better mileage – Hunter 350 or Classic 350?
The Hunter 350 offers slightly better mileage, averaging around 36-40 km/l compared to the Classic’s 32-36 km/l.
Is the Classic 350 good for long rides?
Yes, the Classic 350 is excellent for highway cruising thanks to its comfortable seat, stable ride, and relaxed ergonomics.
Which one is more value for money?
If you’re budget-conscious and want a stylish Enfield for city use, the Hunter 350 is more value for money. But if you want the full classic Enfield feel, the Classic 350 justifies its price.
